February+22,+2011

· ** Students that are currently at a score of 43 and below, or at the Intensive level on the AIMS Web data, will move up to at least a score of 60 by the Winter AIMS Web data collection. (Jan. 2011) ** · ** 6 % of the currently Intensive level students on the AIMS Web Data, will move to at least Strategic level by the next AIMS Web data collection (approx. January 2011). **  · ** Students who are currently at Strategic level on the AIMS Web data, (12 students or 14%) will obtain a score of at least 100 by the Winter AIMS Web data collection (Jan. 2011) ** ** Students who are at Benchmark in the Fall 2010 of AIMS Web Data (17 students or 19%) will maintain their Benchmark status for the Winter AIMS Web data collection. (Jan. 2011) ** ** Math Goal: By November 30, 2010 – Ten students will move from developing to near fluent, ten students will move from under performing to developing and no student will be under 25 Fastt Facts. ** ||  CORE Reading – we need to be in concensus about the dates we are going to attend. We do not want to leave too many pods short handed. Due to conflict with the rest of the classrooms we are still going to attend on the 3 – 8 days, as we do not want to leave them hanging in the lurch. Our dates are March 22, March 29, and April 12. Phonics instruction: Long and short vowels for the rest of this week and next week before Spring Break. We discussed the WIDA exam and the difficultly our students had on the test this morning. We discussed that students need to work on listening and following directions. We also need to do some practice testing. We are concerned about the largeness of the room and being with the other kids, and the fact that it was Monday. Writing Assessments – Due on FileMaker Pro by next Wednesday. (before we leave for Spring Break) || We will put EX. Ed on the next meeting to listen to what gayle has to say. Timelines for our EOU’s and other assessments. ||
 * ** Grade Level ** || 3rd  ||
 * ** Date & Time ** || February 22, 2011  ||
 * ** Present Members ** || Deb Waln, Sarah Manning, Tess Canet,  ||
 * ** Absent Members ** || Chelsea Wilson, Andrew Haines, Pat Eddie  ||
 * ** Facilitator ** ||  ||
 * ** Time Keeper ** || Deb Waln  ||
 * ** Recorder ** || Tess Canet  ||
 * ** Process Observer ** || Chandra Tracy  ||
 * ** Task Master ** || Sarah Manning  ||
 * ** School Goal ** || //** Use most recent Aims Web data at every grade level to identify patterns, design and implement instruction in order to improve student literacy in grades K-3. **// ||
 * ** Grade Level Goal(s) ** || ** Third Grade CWG Literacy Goal (updated 10/8/10) **
 * ** Housekeeping ** || Roles and Norms  ||
 * ** Purpose ** || Collaborate BLT Notes, PBIS Tickets, Discuss CORE reading, Phonics  ||
 * ** Non-purpose ** || Whining and complaining about things we cannot change.  ||
 * ** Linking Prior ** ||  ||
 * ** Discussion ** || PBIS tickets – our group decided that we would not distribute more than 2,000 tickets per month.
 * ** Linking Future ** || Next meeting we will discuss our action plan and our resources needed for the next CORE class.
 * ** Closing ** ||  ||
 * ** Next Meeting ** || Thursday February 24, 2011 @ 2:15  ||